
3C Empresa. Investigación y pensamiento crítico. ISSN: 2254-3376 Ed. 48 Vol. 10 N.º 4 Noviembre 2021 - Febrero 2022
47 https://doi.org/10.17993/3cemp.2021.100448.43-75
2.2. DIMENSIONS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
According to González (2012), four dimensions should be considered to address sustainable development.
These dimensions are society, environment, culture, and economy, which present dynamic relationships
due to the complexity of the construct. According to this approach, man, by constructing himself
socially and culturally, transforms himself, achieving a new cultural environment. On the other hand,
Larrouyet (2015) argues that sustainable development "implies advancing simultaneously in ve
dimensions: economic, human, environmental, institutional and technological" (p. 24). Therefore, the
characterization of the sustainable development prole to be designed depends on the socio-cultural
context characteristics of the nations.
The present research considers three dimensions of sustainable development, which should be assumed
as a systemic and indissoluble triad: economy, society, and environment (Carro-suárez & Sarmiento-
Paredes, 2017). Regardless of the context, the fundamental premise for the introduction of sustainable
development in state policies must be examined from the theory of systems, evaluating it in the non-
decreasing function of its inputs and outputs, with evolutionary and increasingly demanding concepts
and measurements, based on a drastic change of people's culture, with binding state policies concerning
all the dynamic and indissoluble relationships of the variables of environmental sustainability. Some of
these interdependencies can probably be temporarily bypassed, but history shows that before long, some
alarm or crisis calls for a return to the path of sustainable development.
While it is true that this article addresses sustainable development based on three dimensions (Artaraz,
2001), a reductionist and non-systemic perspective, which for many researchers has a utilitarian
approach, it is urgent to evaluate the interdependencies between the three pillars, wherein a prevalent
analysis it establishes that social welfare and economic welfare nurture each other in correspondence
of univocal relationships and that they only become sustainable within a balanced and sustainable
ecosystem in time and space (Carro-Suárez & Sarmiento-Paredes, 2017). It is fundamental to understand
complexity, based on the systemic model of sustainability (Kammerbauer, 2001), considering dynamic,